|
Potential use of retrovirus vectors against HIV-1: Construction of ribozymes/DNA-enzymes to interfere with HIV-1 replication |
| Principal Investigator : Akhil C Banerjea
Ph
D Students HIV-1
pathogenesis is multifactorial and involve complex interactions between host
and viral genes. We wish to identify some of those genes and selectively
interfere with their functions. This goal will be achieved by using nucleic
acid based approaches to interfere with the replication of HIV-1. Our approach
is significantly different than protein based approaches that usually elicit
undesirable immune responses. We wish to exploit the use of novel interfering
genes and retrovirus vectors to obtain stable gene expression in the host
cells that are exploited by HIV, mainly T lymphocytes and macrophages. HIV-1
uses the HIV-1 coreceptors, the chemokine receptors along with CD4 receptor
protein to gain entry and initiate infection in host cells. This is
accomplished by the close interaction of HIV-1 envelope protein, chemokine
receptors and CD4 protein. This results in membrane fusion and entry of the
virus. Several virus genes are expressed that contribute to the pathology of
the disease. Structural and regulatory proteins are produced that are
essential for the virus replication cycle. In particular, HIV-1 Tat and Rev
play an important role in governing transcription and replication of HIV-1.
Since T lymphocytes and macrophages are the two major host cells for HIV-1
replication, it would be ideal to introduce novel interfering genes into
hematopoietic stem cells. DNA-enzyme
cleavage sites in HIV-1 gag and nef regions Since
the genome of HIV-1 accumulates mutations at a rapid pace, any antiviral
approach must target many regions simultaneously. We had for the first time
reported bioefficacy of a multitarget DNA-enzyme against the X gene of
hepatitis B virus (Goila and Banerjea, 2001). This will prevent or delay the
appearance of escape mutants. Therefore, additional target sites have to be
identified that are cleaved more efficiently. We report the identification of
two DNA-enzyme cleavage sites in the most conserved HIV-1 p24 gag and Nef
regions. In order to test the efficacy of these DNA-enzymes, initially the
HIV-1 Gag and Nef genes were cloned into pcDNA vector such that their
expression was under the control of CMV/T7 promoter. These recombinant
plasmids were used to generate in vitro transcripts using T7 RNA polymerase.
DNA-enzymes along with their mutant controls (disabled) were synthesized
chemically. All the DNA-enzymes showed sequence specific cleavage activities.
Interestingly, one of the two DNA-enzymes from each category, showed
significantly more cleavage in the presence of lower amounts of Mg++. This
information is important because we and others have earlier shown that
DNA-enzymes that show sequence specific cleavage activity in the physiological
levels of Mg++ (intracellular concentrations being in the range of 1 - 2 mM),
are generally more bio-efficacious. DNA-enzyme-1422 (against HIV-1 gag) and
DNA-enzyme-8844 (against Nef) (the number denotes the nucleotide position in
pNL4-3 HIV-1 DNA) were found to be more potent in inhibiting HIV-1 gene
expression. When cotransfected with the Gag DNA-enzyme, about four fold
reduction in HIV-1 p24 production was observed. It is important to mention
that this difference is observed when only a single round of replication has
taken place because HeLa cells lack the appropriate HIV-1 receptors (CCR5 or
CXCR4) needed for the virus to spread, and therefore, this data is
significant. On the contrary, Nef-DNA-enzymes failed to interfere with the
replication of laboratory adapted HIV-1. This is expected because Nef is not
known to exert any significant effect in the in vitro replication of HIV-1.
Nef, however, is known to exert global changes, the most interesting being its
ability to down modulate CD4. We tested our most effective Nef DNA-enzyme
(8844) for the down modulation of CD4 in a cell fusion dependent reporter gene
assay and found out that this DNA-enzyme was at least 4 fold more effective in
down modulating CD4 protein than the Nef DNA-enzyme (Dz-8822) that cleaved the
substrate RNA poorly in the presence of lower concentrations of MgCl2.
In summary we have identified a potent DNA-enzyme against HIV-1 gag that could
be exploited for achieving specific suppression of HIV-1 and potentially could
be combined with other antiviral approaches. This gene is the most conserved
among all the genetic subtypes including genetic subtype C that is the most
prevalent strain of HIV-1 in India. Potential
use of small interfering RNAs, lentivirus vector and hematopoietic stem cells
as an antiviral approach against HIV-1 Human
CD34+ cells were isolated from human fetal liver using the CD34 islation kit
and purified on a magnetic column. The purity was checked by staining with
CD34-FITC antibody and FACS analysis. The purity was usually in the range of
90% or more. They were then transduced with lentivirus vector that contained
the reporter gene GFP under CMV promoter and pol III promoter directed small
interfering RNA (siRNA) against HIV-1 Rev. Macrophages were derived from the
these cells by culturing them in the presence of GM-CSF and M-CSF. Thymocytes
were derived after placing these transduced cells into the thy/liv grafts of
SCID-hu mice. Both macrophges and T-cells showed impressive inhibition against
R5 and X4-tropic isolates of HIV-1.
Publications Original peer-reviewed articles 1.
Dash BC and Banerjea AC (2004) Sequence specific cleavage activities of
DNA-enzymes targeted against HIV-1 Gag and Nef regions. Oligonucleotides
14:41-47. 2.
†Anderson J, Banerjea A and Akkina R (2003). Bispecific short hairpin siRNA
constructs targeted to CD4, CXCR4, and CCR5 confer HIV-1 resistance. Oligonucleotides
13:303-312 (†on deputation/work done elsewhere). 3.
†Banerjea A, Li M, Bauer G, Remling L, Lee N-S, Rossi J and Akkina R (2003).
Potent inhibition of HIV-1 by lentiviral vector transduced siRNAs in primary
human T-lymphocytes differentiated in SCID-hu mice and CD34+ progenitor cell
derived macrophages. Mol Ther 8:62-71 (†on deputation/work done
elsewhere). 4.
*Chakraborti S and Banerjea AC (2003). Inhibition of HIV-1 gene expression by
novel DNA enzymes targeted to cleave HIV-1 TAR RNA: Potential effectiveness
against all HIV-1 isolates. Mol Ther 7:817-826 (*in press last year,
since published). 5.
*Chakraborti S and Banerjea AC (2003) Identification of cleavage sites in the
HIV-1 TAR RNA by 10-23 and 8-17 catalytic motif containing DNA enzymes. Biomacromolecules
4:568-571 (*in press last year, since published). 6.
†Anderson J, Banerjea A, Planelles V and Akkina R. (2003) Potent suppression
of infection by a stem-loop structured anti-CXCR4 siRNA. AIDS Res Human
Retroviruses 19:699-706 (†on deputation/work done elsewhere). 7.
†Akkina R, Banerjea A, Bai J, Anderson J, Ming-Jie Li and Rossi J (2003)
siRNA, ribozymes, and RNA decoys in modeling stem cell based gene therapy for
HIV/AIDS. Anticancer Res 23:1997-2006 (†on deputation/work done
elsewhere).
Reviews/Proceedings 1. Chakraborti S, Sriram B and Banerjea AC (2003) In vitro selected RNA-cleaving DNA-enzymes from combinatorial libraries. In: Methods in molecular biology-ribozymes and siRNA protocols. (Ed: Mouldy Sioud) Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA, 279-290. |